06 April 2013
Life, Itself by Roger Ebert
Before I read this book, I wasn’t informed in any considerable way as to
Ebert’s past. I figured that he had a boring life that nonetheless was
full to the brim with observations and anecdotes about movies, actors,
and the business. Imagine my surprise when I learned in instance after
instance about the tumult in the man’s life. We’ve got anecdotes about
everything from school, Catholicism, racism, family, cars, sex, Robert
Mitchum, alcoholism, television, death, his own brushes with death, the
Chicago newspaper scene, Steak ‘N Shake, bars, books, women, and travel.
I had no idea in the least that he’d been around the block so many
times. As Ebert makes clear, he misses some of it, but a good deal of it
is seen with the pain that only a hard won wisdom seems to make
tolerable. “Bitter” or “lonely” are the last words I’d use to describe
Ebert. Still, many regrets are registered, but all in a tone of
gratitude and good humor. This aspect of the book fascinated me greatly.
The animating force seems to be his curiosity about the world and his
joy at being part of it. Perhaps this is natural for a man who almost
died on a few occasions, but what impressed me was the humility related
in these stories. I almost wish it could have been longer as the range
of his anecdotes and opinions rarely grew stale. While it was somewhat
disappointing that the book wasn’t filled entirely with info about the
movies – the sections on Russ Meyer, Martin Scorsese, and Werner Herzog
were excellent though to my mind too brief – he has many great stories
about being a newspaper and television critic. Anyone interested in
Chicago newspapers should read this book at once as Ebert makes this
lost era glow with nostalgia even though he never romanticizes it. (His
well-timed digs at Rupert Murdoch are priceless.) I loved the discussion
of his library as the man’s passion for books and reading is so
familiar to the many of us who share it that it soon becomes likely that
an entire book on the subject by Ebert would be a gift from heaven. His
late chapter on religion is one of the most moving anecdotal treatments
of the subject that I’ve ever read that I wonder at how many of the
present world’s so-called experts in theology and philosophy could be so
boring and tone deaf. In addition to his humble curiosity about the
world, his joy around others – whether it was family, Chicago
newspapermen, friends at film festivals, or characters in books –
emerges as the strongest testament to the man’s love of life. He
captures the sights and rhythms of life with lovely detail and a paucity
of affectation. He also gives equal time to his triumphs like having
his television show for so long and getting to interview the likes of
Robert Mitchum and John Wayne – he never brags about that Pulitzer,
though – as well as his failures such as the medical history of
radiation in his late life being a very painful example. I wouldn’t call
this one of the greatest memoirs ever, but it’s still a very strong
achievement for what would seem to be a very ordinary life.
04 April 2013
Roger Ebert
He was, in short, the very best kind of middlebrow, an earnest enthusiast who took his work seriously. - Terry Teachout
I came late to Ebert's writing. In high school, I read his essay on swearing in movies - Bogie saying "fuck" after losing Ingrid - but that was it. The popular dismissal was a major factor as well. (His opinions of David Lynch's movies didn't help, either.) I was too busy reading John Simon, taking his recommendations, and watching other art films. Then reading more on film and its creators. I even bought a copy of The Great Movies and Awake In The Dark. I wasn't drawn to the man until Twitter, however. His interest in politics intrigued me then encouraged me. Here was a dimension to the man that I hadn't known existed. I read his reviews more and more. Then I read his memoir Life, Itself and it changed me. I was very impressed by his humility and curiosity. A new respect grew in me. I read his reviews for fun more often as I enjoyed his style and outlook. His evaluations were quite different to every other review that I consulted. It became a pleasure to take part in what he offered to the world. He's offered so much. Now his work awaits the rest of us too slow to sit beside him. He waited - now we can only say thank you.
I came late to Ebert's writing. In high school, I read his essay on swearing in movies - Bogie saying "fuck" after losing Ingrid - but that was it. The popular dismissal was a major factor as well. (His opinions of David Lynch's movies didn't help, either.) I was too busy reading John Simon, taking his recommendations, and watching other art films. Then reading more on film and its creators. I even bought a copy of The Great Movies and Awake In The Dark. I wasn't drawn to the man until Twitter, however. His interest in politics intrigued me then encouraged me. Here was a dimension to the man that I hadn't known existed. I read his reviews more and more. Then I read his memoir Life, Itself and it changed me. I was very impressed by his humility and curiosity. A new respect grew in me. I read his reviews for fun more often as I enjoyed his style and outlook. His evaluations were quite different to every other review that I consulted. It became a pleasure to take part in what he offered to the world. He's offered so much. Now his work awaits the rest of us too slow to sit beside him. He waited - now we can only say thank you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)